Gemini 4 Argon vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
How does Gemini 4 Argon (Google) compare against DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek)? Side-by-side scores, capability ratings and pricing, plus a clear verdict.
🏆 Quick verdict
Gemini 4 Argon comes out ahead with an AIVerso score of 96 vs 92 and an aggregate capability rating of 653 vs 595 across 7 categories. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the budget pick with a free tier. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is open source and can be self-hosted.
Overall winner
Gemini 4 Argon
by Google
Score: 96/100
Price$2/$10 per 1M tokens (API, intro)
Pricing detailsAPI $2/$10 per 1M (intro), later $4/$20 · Gemini app on paid Google plans
Context window1M
Free tierNo
API accessYes
Open sourceNo
Headline factsGoogle's new flagship · AA Intelligence Index 53 (ties GPT-6 Astra) · #1 on AutomationBench-AA · 15% hallucination rate (AA-Omniscience) · 1M context
Try Gemini 4 Argon →
Full Gemini 4 Argon profile →
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
by DeepSeek
Score: 92/100
PriceFree · API $0.30/$1.20 per 1M
Pricing detailsFree chat at chat.deepseek.com · API $0.30/$1.20 per 1M tokens, cheaper off-peak · Free weights (MIT license)
Context window1M
Free tierYes
API accessYes
Open sourceYes
Headline factsDeepSeek's current flagship (Oct 17 build) · AA Intelligence Index 45 · DeepSWE v1.1 77.0 · 1M context · MIT open weights
Try DeepSeek V4.1 Flash →
Full DeepSeek V4.1 Flash profile → 📊 Capability ratings
AIVerso capability ratings (0–100) per category — an editorial summary informed by public benchmark results. Higher is better.
Category
Gemini 4 Argon
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Math & Logice.g. AIME, MATH-500
92
90
Programminge.g. SWE-bench, LiveCodeBench
91
81
Reasoninge.g. GPQA, ARC
94
85
Knowledgee.g. MMLU-Pro
94
85
Long Contexte.g. MRCR, needle tests
96
92
Instruction Followinge.g. IFEval
93
86
Agent Capabilitye.g. Terminal-Bench, tool use
93
76
Why Gemini 4 Argon
Higher overall score (96 vs 92)
Leads on Math & Logic (92 vs 90)
Leads on Programming (91 vs 81)
Leads on Reasoning (94 vs 85)
Leads on Knowledge (94 vs 85)
Leads on Long Context (96 vs 92)
Leads on Instruction Following (93 vs 86)
Why DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Has a free tier
Lower API price (Free · API $0.30/$1.20 per 1M vs $2/$10 per 1M tokens (API, intro))
Open source / open weights
DeepSeek's current flagship (Oct 17 build)
AA Intelligence Index 45
Open this comparison in the live tool →
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better: Gemini 4 Argon or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?
Gemini 4 Argon has the higher AIVerso score (96 vs 92). The better choice still depends on your use case — DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the cheaper option.
How much does Gemini 4 Argon cost compared to DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?
Gemini 4 Argon: $2/$10 per 1M tokens (API, intro) (API $2/$10 per 1M (intro), later $4/$20 · Gemini app on paid Google plans). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Free · API $0.30/$1.20 per 1M (Free chat at chat.deepseek.com · API $0.30/$1.20 per 1M tokens, cheaper off-peak · Free weights (MIT license)). Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a free tier.
What context window does each support?
Gemini 4 Argon: 1M tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1M tokens. The context window determines how much text, code or chat history a model can process at once.
Are Gemini 4 Argon and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash open source?
Gemini 4 Argon is a closed, proprietary model. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is open source / open weights.
How we compare: Scores and capability ratings are based on public benchmarks and provider documentation — not on commission rates. Last updated: October 22, 2026.