DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
How does DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek) compare against Kimi K3.1 Pro (Moonshot AI)? Side-by-side scores, capability ratings and pricing, plus a clear verdict.
🏆 Quick verdict
Kimi K3.1 Pro comes out ahead with an AIVerso score of 95 vs 90 and an aggregate capability rating of 643 vs 595 across 7 categories. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash wins on price — lower API price (API $0.30/$1.20 per 1M vs API $2/$10 per 1M).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
by DeepSeek
Score: 90/100
PriceFree · API $0.30/$1.20 per 1M
Pricing detailsFree chat at chat.deepseek.com · API $0.30/$1.20 per 1M tokens, cheaper off-peak · Free weights (MIT license)
Context window1M
Free tierYes
API accessYes
Open sourceYes
BenchmarksAA Intelligence Index v5: 33
Headline factsDeepSeek's current flagship (Oct 17 build) · AA Intelligence Index 33 · DeepSWE v1.1 77.0 · 1M context · MIT open weights
Try DeepSeek V4.1 Flash →
Full DeepSeek V4.1 Flash profile → Overall winner
Kimi K3.1 Pro
by Moonshot AI
Score: 95/100
PriceFree – API
Pricing detailsFree chat at kimi.com · API $2/$10 per 1M · Highspeed $4/$20 per 1M
Context window1M
Free tierYes
API accessYes
Open sourceYes
BenchmarksAA Intelligence Index v5: 46
Headline factsMoonshot’s new flagship (Oct 23) · AA Intelligence Index 46 · Terminal-Bench 4.0 65.7% (Moonshot) · $2/$10 per 1M · 1M context · open weights on Hugging Face
Try Kimi K3.1 Pro →
Full Kimi K3.1 Pro profile →📊 Capability ratings
AIVerso capability ratings (0–100) per category — an editorial summary informed by public benchmark results. Higher is better.
Category
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Math & Logice.g. AIME, MATH-500
90
95
Programminge.g. SWE-bench, LiveCodeBench
81
92
Reasoninge.g. GPQA, ARC
85
93
Knowledgee.g. MMLU-Pro
85
90
Long Contexte.g. MRCR, needle tests
92
92
Instruction Followinge.g. IFEval
86
92
Agent Capabilitye.g. Terminal-Bench, tool use
76
89
Why DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Lower API price (API $0.30/$1.20 per 1M vs API $2/$10 per 1M)
DeepSeek's current flagship (Oct 17 build)
AA Intelligence Index 33
Why Kimi K3.1 Pro
Higher overall score (95 vs 90)
Leads on Math & Logic (95 vs 90)
Leads on Programming (92 vs 81)
Leads on Reasoning (93 vs 85)
Leads on Knowledge (90 vs 85)
Leads on Instruction Following (92 vs 86)
Leads on Agent Capability (89 vs 76)
Open this comparison in the live tool →
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Kimi K3.1 Pro has the higher AIVerso score (95 vs 90). The better choice still depends on your use case — DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the cheaper option.
How much does DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost compared to Kimi K3.1 Pro?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Free · API $0.30/$1.20 per 1M (Free chat at chat.deepseek.com · API $0.30/$1.20 per 1M tokens, cheaper off-peak · Free weights (MIT license)). Kimi K3.1 Pro: Free – API (Free chat at kimi.com · API $2/$10 per 1M · Highspeed $4/$20 per 1M). Both have a free tier.
What context window does each support?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1M tokens. Kimi K3.1 Pro: 1M tokens. The context window determines how much text, code or chat history a model can process at once.
Are DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Kimi K3.1 Pro open source?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is open source / open weights. Kimi K3.1 Pro is open source / open weights.
How we compare: Scores and capability ratings are based on public benchmarks and provider documentation — not on commission rates. Last updated: November 5, 2026.