AIVerso
Home › Compare › Mistral Large 4 vs GLM-5.3

Mistral Large 4 vs GLM-5.3

How does Mistral Large 4 (Mistral AI) compare against GLM-5.3 (Zhipu AI)? Side-by-side scores, capability ratings and pricing, plus a clear verdict.

🏆 Quick verdict

GLM-5.3 comes out ahead with an AIVerso score of 90 vs 87 and an aggregate capability rating of 613 vs 583 across 7 categories. Mistral Large 4 wins on price — lower API price (API $0.70/$2.10 per 1M tokens vs $1.40/$4.40 per 1M tokens).

Mistral Large 4
by Mistral AI
Score: 87/100
PriceFree – $15/mo
Pricing detailsLe Chat Free · Pro $14.99/mo · Team $24.99/user/mo · API $0.70/$2.10 per 1M tokens · Free weights (Mistral open-weight license)
Context window1M
Free tierYes
API accessYes
Open sourceYes
BenchmarksAA Intelligence Index v5: 26
Headline factsEurope’s open-weight flagship (weights released Oct 29) · AA Intelligence Index 26 · ~1T-parameter MoE, 52B active · Terminal-Bench 4.0 41% (Mistral) · 1M context
Try Mistral Large 4 → Full Mistral Large 4 profile →
Overall winner
GLM-5.3
by Zhipu AI
Score: 90/100
Price$1.40/$4.40 per 1M tokens
Pricing detailsFree (open weights) · $1.40/$4.40 per 1M
Context window1M
Free tierYes
API accessYes
Open sourceYes
BenchmarksAA Intelligence Index v5: 32
Headline factsZ.ai's open-weight flagship · AA Intelligence Index 32 · 753B MoE (40B active) · 1M context
Try GLM-5.3 → Full GLM-5.3 profile →

📊 Capability ratings

AIVerso capability ratings (0–100) per category — an editorial summary informed by public benchmark results. Higher is better.

Category
Mistral Large 4
GLM-5.3
Math & Logice.g. AIME, MATH-500
84
89
Programminge.g. SWE-bench, LiveCodeBench
86
88
Reasoninge.g. GPQA, ARC
83
88
Knowledgee.g. MMLU-Pro
85
86
Long Contexte.g. MRCR, needle tests
82
88
Instruction Followinge.g. IFEval
85
87
Agent Capabilitye.g. Terminal-Bench, tool use
78
87

Why Mistral Large 4

Lower API price (API $0.70/$2.10 per 1M tokens vs $1.40/$4.40 per 1M tokens)
Europe’s open-weight flagship (weights released Oct 29)
AA Intelligence Index 26

Why GLM-5.3

Higher overall score (90 vs 87)
Leads on Math & Logic (89 vs 84)
Leads on Programming (88 vs 86)
Leads on Reasoning (88 vs 83)
Leads on Knowledge (86 vs 85)
Leads on Long Context (88 vs 82)
Leads on Instruction Following (87 vs 85)

Open this comparison in the live tool →

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better: Mistral Large 4 or GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3 has the higher AIVerso score (90 vs 87). The better choice still depends on your use case — Mistral Large 4 is the cheaper option.

How much does Mistral Large 4 cost compared to GLM-5.3?

Mistral Large 4: Free – $15/mo (Le Chat Free · Pro $14.99/mo · Team $24.99/user/mo · API $0.70/$2.10 per 1M tokens · Free weights (Mistral open-weight license)). GLM-5.3: $1.40/$4.40 per 1M tokens (Free (open weights) · $1.40/$4.40 per 1M). Both have a free tier.

What context window does each support?

Mistral Large 4: 1M tokens. GLM-5.3: 1M tokens. The context window determines how much text, code or chat history a model can process at once.

Are Mistral Large 4 and GLM-5.3 open source?

Mistral Large 4 is open source / open weights. GLM-5.3 is open source / open weights.

🔗 Related comparisons

How we compare: Scores and capability ratings are based on public benchmarks and provider documentation — not on commission rates. Last updated: November 11, 2026.